糖心vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST 糖心vlog News at 10pm Weeknights
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

President Biden says he's mulling health emergency for abortion access

President Biden says he's mulling health emergency for abortion access
Mr. Press right last, let's be clear about something from the very start. This was not *** decision driven by the constitution. Let me say it again. This was not *** decision driven by the constitution. And despite what those justices the majority said. This was not *** decision driven by history. The truth is today's Supreme Court majority that is playing fast and loose with the facts. We need two additional pro choice senators and *** pro choice house to codify roe as federal law. Your vote can make that *** reality. I know it's frustrating and it made *** lot of people very angry. But the truth is this and it's not just me saying it, it's what the court said. When you read the decision, the court has made clear, it will not protect the rights of women period period. It's my hope and strong belief that women will in fact turn out in record numbers to reclaim the rights that have taken from them by the court? Let me be clear. Well, I wish it had not come to this. This is the fastest route available. I'm just stating *** basic fundamental notion, the fastest way to restore wo ro is to pass *** national law. Codifying Roe, 10 years old, rape, six weeks pregnant, already traumatized, is forced to travel to another state. Imagine being that little girl. Just I'm serious. Just imagine being that little girl 10 years old. Does anyone believe that it's Ohio's majority view that that should not be able to be dealt with or in any other state in the nation, *** 10 year old girl should be forced to give birth to *** rapist child. I can tell you what I don't I can't think of anything as much more extreme. When tens of millions of women vote this year. They won't be alone, millions and millions of men. We're taking up the fight alongside them to restore the right to choose and the broader right to privacy in this nation, which they denied existed. And the challenge from the court to the american women and men. This is *** nation. The challenges go out and vote well, for God's sake, there's an election november vote, vote, vote, vote.
Advertisement
President Biden says he's mulling health emergency for abortion access
President Joe Biden said Sunday he is considering declaring a public health emergency to free up federal resources to promote abortion access even though the White House has said it doesn't seem like "a great option."He also offered a message to people enraged by the Supreme Court's ruling last month that ended a constitutional right to abortion and who have been demonstrating across the country: "Keep protesting. Keep making your point. It's critically important."The president, in remarks to reporters during a stop on a bike ride near his family's Delaware beach house, said he lacks the power to force the dozen-plus states with strict restrictions or outright bans on abortion to allow the procedure."I don't have the authority to say that we're going to reinstate Roe v. Wade as the law of the land," he said, referring to the Supreme Court's decision from 1973 that had established a national right to abortion. Biden said Congress would have to codify that right and for that to have a better chance in the future, voters would have to elect more lawmakers who support abortion access.Biden said his administration is trying to do a "lot of things to accommodate the rights of women" after the ruling, including considering declaring a public health emergency to free up federal resources. Such a move has been pushed by advocates, but White House officials have questioned both its legality and effectiveness, and noted it would almost certainly face legal challenges.The president said he has asked officials "to look at whether I have the authority to do that and what impact that would have."On Friday, Jen Klein, the director of the White House Gender Policy Council, said it "didn't seem like a great option.""When we looked at the public health emergency, we learned a couple things: One is that it doesn't free very many resources," she told reporters. "It's what's in the public health emergency fund, and there's very little money 鈥� tens of thousands of dollars in it. So that didn't seem like a great option. And it also doesn't release a significant amount of legal authority. And so that's why we haven't taken that action yet."___Associated Press writer Zeke Miller in Washington contributed to this report.

President Joe Biden said Sunday he is considering declaring a public health emergency to free up federal resources to promote abortion access even though the White House has said it doesn't seem like "a great option."

He also offered a message to people enraged by the Supreme Court's ruling last month that ended a constitutional right to abortion and who have been demonstrating across the country: "Keep protesting. Keep making your point. It's critically important."

Advertisement

The president, in remarks to reporters during a stop on a bike ride near his family's Delaware beach house, said he lacks the power to force the dozen-plus states with strict restrictions or outright bans on abortion to allow the procedure.

"I don't have the authority to say that we're going to reinstate Roe v. Wade as the law of the land," he said, referring to the Supreme Court's decision from 1973 that had established a national right to abortion. Biden said Congress would have to codify that right and for that to have a better chance in the future, voters would have to elect more lawmakers who support abortion access.

Biden said his administration is trying to do a "lot of things to accommodate the rights of women" after the ruling, including considering declaring a public health emergency to free up federal resources. Such a move has been pushed by advocates, but White House officials have questioned both its legality and effectiveness, and noted it would almost certainly face legal challenges.

The president said he has asked officials "to look at whether I have the authority to do that and what impact that would have."

On Friday, Jen Klein, the director of the White House Gender Policy Council, said it "didn't seem like a great option."

"When we looked at the public health emergency, we learned a couple things: One is that it doesn't free very many resources," she told reporters. "It's what's in the public health emergency fund, and there's very little money 鈥� tens of thousands of dollars in it. So that didn't seem like a great option. And it also doesn't release a significant amount of legal authority. And so that's why we haven't taken that action yet."

___

Associated Press writer Zeke Miller in Washington contributed to this report.