vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Arguments heard at Iowa Supreme Court could impact state abortion access

The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.

Arguments heard at Iowa Supreme Court could impact state abortion access

The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.

>> STEVE, WE’RE LOOKING AT SOME NEW JUSTICES ON THE BEH APPOINTED BY GOVERNOR REYNOLDS. FOUR YEARS AGO THE IOWA SUPREME COURT RULED OUR STATE CONSTITUTION DOES PROVIDE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO ABOIORT BUT THIS CASE COULD OVERTURN THAT RULG. >> A 2020 STATE LAW AT THE CENTER OF A LEGAL BATTLE. THE LAW WOULD REQUIRE WOMEN TO WAIT 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR FIRST APPOINTMENT BEFORE GETTINGN ABORTION. >> LOWER COURTS HAVE ALREADY RULED AGAINST THIS MEDICALLY UNNECESSARY WAITING PERIOD, SAYING IT INDISCRIMINATELY SUBJECTS ALL WOMEN TO AN UNJUSTIFIED DELAY IN MEDAL CARE. >> BUT MAGGIE DEWITTE WITH PULSE LIFE ADVOCATES HOPES THE STATE SUPREME COURT RULES DIFFERENTLY. >> WHEN WE’RE TALKING ABOUT A DECISION THAT IS AS MONUMENT AS THE LIFE OF YOUR UNBORN CHILD, AND WHETHER TO CONTUEIN THAT LIFE OR NOT, IT ONLY MAKES COMMON SENSE THAT WE GIVE ATTH WOMAN SOME TIME AND PAUSE TO REALLY THINK THROUGH ALL HER CHOICES, ALL HER OIONS.PT OTHERS SAY THIS RULING COULD HAVE LARGER IMCTPA >> IF THE IOWA SUPREME COURT OVTUERRNS THE STEAT CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION RFO SAFE AND LEGAL ABORTION, LAWMAKERS WHO CONTROL THE STATE GOVERNMENT WOULD HAVE THE UNCHECKED AUTHORITTOANY ABORTION. >> SHE SAYS FEDERAL LAW WOULD STILL PROTECT ABORTION ACCESS BUT THAT COULD BE OVERTURNED THIS SUMMER IN A NEW U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING. THAT WOULD LEAVE ALL ABORTION DECISIONS UP TO STATE LAWMAKER >> FEDERAL ABORTION PROTECTIONS HANG BY THADRE >> THAT IS WHY THE COURT CASE THAT WE HEARD ORAL ARGUMENTS HERE TODAY IN IOWA IS SO IMPORTANT BECAUSE THAT WILL MECO BACK TO IOWA, FOR US TO DETERMINE HOW BEST TO RELAGU AND SAFEGUARD WOMEN AND FAMILIES IN REGARDS TO ABTIONOR >> IN 2018, THE COURT RULEA 72-HOUR WAITING PERIOD -- WAS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. A RU
Advertisement
Arguments heard at Iowa Supreme Court could impact state abortion access

The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.

The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday morning regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.The legal challenge began in 2018 with HF 594 that would require women to wait 72 hours before an abortion is performed. That law was struck down by the Iowa Supreme Court in 2018. The court ruled that a 72-hour waiting period violated equal protection and due process provisions of the Iowa Constitution. In 2020, the majority Republican legislature approved an amendment, changing the waiting period to 24 hours. After Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit, a district court ruled that a 24-hour waiting period was also unconstitutional.Gov. Kim Reynolds appealed that decision to the Iowa Supreme Court who heard oral arguments Wednesday morning. “The stakes in this case are much higher than just the medically-unnecessary 24-hour waiting period,” said Jamie Burch Elliott, Director of Public Affairs for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Iowa. "If the Iowa Supreme Court overturns the state constitutional protection for safe and legal abortion, lawmakers who control the state government would have the unchecked authority to ban abortion."Maggie DeWitte with Pulse Life Advocates said she's hopeful the Iowa Supreme Court will reverse their 2018 decision that ruled Iowa's constitution provides a fundamental right to abortion. "We have new justices that have been appointed by Governor Reynolds. We feel that's very positive in our favor that we have some justices that are pro-life and will rule in that way," DeWitte said. The ruling on the 24-hour waiting period is expected this summer.More from Amanda Rooker:

The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday morning regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.

The legal challenge began in 2018 with that would require women to wait 72 hours before an abortion is performed. That law was struck down by the Iowa Supreme Court in 2018. The court ruled that a 72-hour waiting period violated equal protection and due process provisions of the Iowa Constitution.

Advertisement

In 2020, the majority Republican legislature approved an amendment, changing the waiting period to 24 hours. After Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit, a district court ruled that a 24-hour waiting period was also unconstitutional.

Gov. Kim Reynolds appealed that decision to the Iowa Supreme Court who heard oral arguments Wednesday morning.

“The stakes in this case are much higher than just the medically-unnecessary 24-hour waiting period,” said Jamie Burch Elliott, Director of Public Affairs for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Iowa. "If the Iowa Supreme Court overturns the state constitutional protection for safe and legal abortion, lawmakers who control the state government would have the unchecked authority to ban abortion."

Maggie DeWitte with Pulse Life Advocates said she's hopeful the Iowa Supreme Court will reverse their 2018 decision that ruled Iowa's constitution provides a fundamental right to abortion.

"We have new justices that have been appointed by Governor Reynolds. We feel that's very positive in our favor that we have some justices that are pro-life and will rule in that way," DeWitte said.

The ruling on the 24-hour waiting period is expected this summer.

More from Amanda Rooker: