Arguments heard at Iowa Supreme Court could impact state abortion access
The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.
The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.
The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.
The Iowa Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday morning regarding an Iowa law that would require women to wait 24 hours after an initial appointment before getting an abortion.
The legal challenge began in 2018 with that would require women to wait 72 hours before an abortion is performed. That law was struck down by the Iowa Supreme Court in 2018. The court ruled that a 72-hour waiting period violated equal protection and due process provisions of the Iowa Constitution.
In 2020, the majority Republican legislature approved an amendment, changing the waiting period to 24 hours. After Planned Parenthood filed a lawsuit, a district court ruled that a 24-hour waiting period was also unconstitutional.
Gov. Kim Reynolds appealed that decision to the Iowa Supreme Court who heard oral arguments Wednesday morning.
“The stakes in this case are much higher than just the medically-unnecessary 24-hour waiting period,” said Jamie Burch Elliott, Director of Public Affairs for Planned Parenthood Advocates of Iowa. "If the Iowa Supreme Court overturns the state constitutional protection for safe and legal abortion, lawmakers who control the state government would have the unchecked authority to ban abortion."
Maggie DeWitte with Pulse Life Advocates said she's hopeful the Iowa Supreme Court will reverse their 2018 decision that ruled Iowa's constitution provides a fundamental right to abortion.
"We have new justices that have been appointed by Governor Reynolds. We feel that's very positive in our favor that we have some justices that are pro-life and will rule in that way," DeWitte said.
The ruling on the 24-hour waiting period is expected this summer.
More from Amanda Rooker: