vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at 6am Weekday Mornings
Live Now
Advertisement

Appeals court overturns right-wing influencer’s conviction for spreading 2016 election falsehoods

Appeals court overturns right-wing influencer’s conviction for spreading 2016 election falsehoods
People love coming here. It's rich in history, culture as his feet hit the pavement. I actually love the entire town. Marlon Daniels soaks up the history of his hometown. People wanna know where the oldest black municipality is in America. That town is Eatonville, Florida. The history dates back to 1887 and Daniels wanted to be *** part of it. I said, hey, it's time to get out and see if we can make *** difference here in the community. And this is where our story really begins when Daniels ran for town council. What exactly happened? Looking at the preliminary unofficial results I won by nine votes. *** couple days later, they say I was winning by one vote and then at the final, they say I lost by 11 vote. That's when something clicked. He remembered what *** man told him outside town hall on election day. I had *** gentleman come up to me and say that he was told to go in and vote for *** certain individual for him to be able to live where he was living at. So Marlo challenged the election and won in court. I got to take the seat as the elected official here in the town of Ville. So what happened voter or election fraud, the illegal interference with an election to try to manipulate an outcome. It is illegal. Ambassador Tim Romer is *** member of the National Council on election integrity. *** bipartisan group focused on strengthening our election system. The most surprising thing he told me is that voter fraud isn't *** big problem. Well, it doesn't happen much at all. It's against the law. We have local trained officials that seek it out that are trained to find it trained officials like the people in charge of running elections, secretaries of state. Are they worried? What concerns do you have about widespread fraud? I, I don't have really any concerns about that. Very limited in Mississippi. I don't have any concerns about widespread voter fraud in Kentucky. I don't have concerns about widespread fraud. So why aren't elected officials concerned after coming here and speaking with someone who was *** victim of voter fraud? We wanted to answer one question, how many people have been convicted of it? We started by creating our own database through our own research and using two public data sets. The national investigative unit found 410 instances since 2016 where some level of voter or election fraud led to *** criminal conviction or court action. You divide that up by the states that's *** couple per state. 96% of those instances involved people committing crimes from registering fraudulently but never voting to criminal conduct at the ballot box. Leading to 14 cases where *** new election was ordered or the election was overturned in all. But one case, the election in question was municipal county or statewide, but the number of total votes are smaller and the margins are thinner. Presidential elections are even the closest ones in the last presidential election were somewhere between 8020 5000 votes. In places like Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia. Two or three people mistakenly trying to vote in those places does not have any impact on the election. And that's the reality. Voter fraud doesn't seem to affect presidential elections, but it can affect local ones. Sometimes we get uh really kind of focused on federal elections and we forget about these school board elections or these local elections where every vote matters. Those couple of votes could switch *** school board election and that school board election can impact your taxes. Local elections just like the one Daniels was involved in. It can happen anywhere. I believe in the process. I believe that we handle people that try to interfere with um elections one way, but we still don't take away from the, the American dream of being able to vote.
AP logo
Updated: 1:09 PM CDT Jul 9, 2025
Editorial Standards
Advertisement
Appeals court overturns right-wing influencer’s conviction for spreading 2016 election falsehoods
AP logo
Updated: 1:09 PM CDT Jul 9, 2025
Editorial Standards
A federal appeals court on Wednesday overturned a self-styled right-wing propagandist's conviction for spreading falsehoods on social media in an effort to suppress Democratic turnout in the 2016 presidential election.Related video above: What does voter fraud in the US really look like?The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan ordered a lower court to enter a judgment of acquittal for Douglass Mackey, finding that trial evidence failed to prove the government's claim that the Florida man conspired with others to influence the election.Mackey, 36, was convicted in March 2023 in federal court in Brooklyn on a charge of conspiracy against rights after posting false memes that said supporters of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton could vote for her by text message or social media post.He was sentenced to seven months in federal prison. "HALLELUJAH!" Mackey wrote on X after the 2nd Circuit's decision was posted Wednesday. In follow up messages, he thanked God, his family, wife, lawyers and supporters, and threatened legal action over his conviction.One of Mackey's lawyers on his appeal was Yaakov Roth, who is now principal deputy assistant U.S. attorney general in charge of the Justice Department's Civil Division.The federal prosecutors' office in Brooklyn that brought the case declined to comment.In charging Mackey, prosecutors alleged that he conspired with others between September and November of 2016 to post memes, such as a photo of a woman standing in front of an "African Americans for Hillary" sign. "Avoid the Line. Vote from Home," the tweet said. "Text 'Hillary' to 59925."About 5,000 people followed the meme's instructions, according to trial testimony. Nearly all of them received an automated response indicating that the social media posts were not associated with the Clinton campaign, and there was "no evidence at trial that Mackey's tweets tricked anyone into failing properly to vote," the 2nd Circuit found.Mackey, who had 58,000 followers at the time, posted under the alias Ricky Vaughn, the name of Charlie Sheen's character in the movie "Major League."In overturning Mackey's conviction, a three-judge 2nd Circuit panel wrote, "the mere fact" that he "posted the memes, even assuming that he did so with the intent to injure other citizens in the exercise of their right to vote, is not enough, standing alone, to prove a violation" of the conspiracy law. "The government was obligated to show that Mackey knowingly entered into an agreement with other people to pursue that objective," Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Judges Reena Raggi and Beth Robinson wrote. "This the government failed to do."Livingston and Raggi were appointed by President George W. Bush, a Republican. Robinson was appointed by President Joe Biden, a Democrat.At Mackey's sentencing, the trial judge, Ann M. Donnelly, said that he had been "one of the leading members" of a conspiracy that was "nothing short of an assault on our democracy."The 2nd Circuit disagreed, ruling that the prosecution's primary evidence of a conspiracy was flimsy at best.At Mackey's trial, prosecutors showed messages exchanged in private Twitter groups that they said proved an intent to interfere with people exercising their right to vote. However, the three-judge panel ruled that prosecutors "failed to offer sufficient evidence that Mackey even viewed — let alone participated in — any of these exchanges.""In the absence of such evidence, the government's remaining circumstantial evidence cannot alone establish Mackey's knowing agreement," the judges wrote.

A federal appeals court on Wednesday overturned a self-styled right-wing propagandist's conviction for spreading falsehoods on social media in an effort to suppress Democratic turnout in the 2016 presidential election.

Related video above: What does voter fraud in the US really look like?

Advertisement

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan ordered a lower court to enter a judgment of acquittal for Douglass Mackey, finding that trial evidence failed to prove the government's claim that the Florida man conspired with others to influence the election.

Mackey, 36, was convicted in March 2023 in federal court in Brooklyn on a charge of conspiracy against rights after posting false memes that said supporters of Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton could vote for her by text message or social media post.

He was sentenced to seven months in federal prison.

"HALLELUJAH!" Mackey wrote on X after the 2nd Circuit's decision was posted Wednesday. In follow up messages, he thanked God, his family, wife, lawyers and supporters, and threatened legal action over his conviction.

One of Mackey's lawyers on his appeal was Yaakov Roth, who is now principal deputy assistant U.S. attorney general in charge of the Justice Department's Civil Division.

The federal prosecutors' office in Brooklyn that brought the case declined to comment.

In charging Mackey, prosecutors alleged that he conspired with others between September and November of 2016 to post memes, such as a photo of a woman standing in front of an "African Americans for Hillary" sign. "Avoid the Line. Vote from Home," the tweet said. "Text 'Hillary' to 59925."

About 5,000 people followed the meme's instructions, according to trial testimony. Nearly all of them received an automated response indicating that the social media posts were not associated with the Clinton campaign, and there was "no evidence at trial that Mackey's tweets tricked anyone into failing properly to vote," the 2nd Circuit found.

Mackey, who had 58,000 followers at the time, posted under the alias Ricky Vaughn, the name of Charlie Sheen's character in the movie "Major League."

In overturning Mackey's conviction, a three-judge 2nd Circuit panel wrote, "the mere fact" that he "posted the memes, even assuming that he did so with the intent to injure other citizens in the exercise of their right to vote, is not enough, standing alone, to prove a violation" of the conspiracy law.

"The government was obligated to show that Mackey knowingly entered into an agreement with other people to pursue that objective," Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Judges Reena Raggi and Beth Robinson wrote. "This the government failed to do."

Livingston and Raggi were appointed by President George W. Bush, a Republican. Robinson was appointed by President Joe Biden, a Democrat.

At Mackey's sentencing, the trial judge, Ann M. Donnelly, said that he had been "one of the leading members" of a conspiracy that was "nothing short of an assault on our democracy."

The 2nd Circuit disagreed, ruling that the prosecution's primary evidence of a conspiracy was flimsy at best.

At Mackey's trial, prosecutors showed messages exchanged in private Twitter groups that they said proved an intent to interfere with people exercising their right to vote. However, the three-judge panel ruled that prosecutors "failed to offer sufficient evidence that Mackey even viewed — let alone participated in — any of these exchanges."

"In the absence of such evidence, the government's remaining circumstantial evidence cannot alone establish Mackey's knowing agreement," the judges wrote.