vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at Noon Weekdays
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Democrats argue AEA bill and new amendment should have been given more time

Democrats argue AEA bill and new amendment should have been given more time
RIGHT NOW. RIGHT NOW, LAWMAKERS ARE FACING MAJOR BACKLASH OVER LAST MINUTE MAJOR CHANGES TO A CRITICAL EDUCATION BILL. THE HOUSE PASSED THE BILL THAT WOULD IMPACT IOWA’S EA’S TEACHER PAY AND SCHOOL FUNDING. vlog BEAU BOWMAN SHOWS US WHY THE TIMELINE FOR THAT VOTE IS NOW UNDER SCRUTINY. DEMOCRATS ACCUSED REPUBLICANS OF WANTING TO FINISH UP DEBATE ON THE BILL BEFORE 630, SO THAT THEY COULD GO AND WATCH THE IOWA STATE BASKETBALL GAME THAT TIPPED OFF JUST MINUTES LATER. REPUBLICANS DENIED THAT CLAIM, AND SAID THE POLICY AND THE NEW AMENDMENT HAD ALREADY BEEN DISCUSSED AT LENGTH. A STATEMENT SENT BY A SPOKESPERSON FOR THE HOUSE REPUBLICAN READS IN PART, AS THE DEMOCRATS KNOW, NOTHING IN THE AMENDMENT IS NEW POLICY. WE’VE WORKED HARD TO TAKE FEEDBACK FROM THE EAA SUPERINTENDENTS AND PARENTS TO FIND A RESOLUTION ON THIS TOPIC. AFTER THE BILL WAS PASSED, SPEAKER PAT GRASSLEY SAID THAT THIS WAS SOMETHING THEY WANTED TO GET DONE BEFORE THEY ADJOURNED FOR THE WEEKEND. DEMOCRATS SAID THE PUBLIC SHOULD HAVE BEEN GIVEN TIME TO WEIGH IN. THAT WAS DONE FOR THE REASON BEING THAT, AGAIN, WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE ACHIEVE THIS GOAL BY GETTING HOME. IT WAS A NUMBER THAT HAD BEEN BATTED AROUND SEVERAL DIFFERENT NUMBERS, AND THAT’S WHERE WE LANDED THIS AT THE VERY LEAST, GIVES THE OPTICS THAT THEY WERE TRYING TO RUSH THIS THROUGH WITHOUT PUBLIC INPUT, BECAUSE THEY KNOW THIS IS NOT A POPULAR PROPOSAL. THE BILL WILL NOW HAVE TO GO ACROSS THE ROTUNDA TO THE SENATE, WHERE IT WILL HAVE TO BE PASSED WITHOUT CHANGES BEFORE HEADING TO GOVERNOR REYNOLDS DESK IN DES MOINES, BEAU BOWMAN vlog EIGHT NEWS. IOWA’S NEWS LEADER. THIS LATEST HOUSE VERSION STARTS MAKING CHANGES IN 2025. SCHOOL DISTRICTS WOULD BE REQUIRED TO GIVE 90% OF THAT FUNDING TO AEAS. TH
Advertisement
Democrats argue AEA bill and new amendment should have been given more time
Iowa House Democrats accused Republicans of wanting to finish up debate on the AEA bill and give it the stamp of approval before 6:30 p.m. Thursday night so they could watch the Iowa State NCAA Tournament game."I really don't want our deliberations limited by the timing of a basketball game," said Rep. Ken Croken, a Democrat from Scott County, during debate on the House floor Thursday. The amendment was filed less than an hour before debate began, and Republicans set a 6:30 p.m. cutoff for debate. It was voted on and passed minutes later, by a margin of 51-43.Speaker Pat Grassley denied those claims, stating the policy in the new amendment had already been debated at length."I haven't watched one basketball game, I don't even know who is playing and when, and if I did, I wouldn't pick the games right anyways," Grassley said. A statement sent by a spokesperson for the House Republicans reads in part: "As the Democrats know, nothing in the amendment is new policy... We have worked hard to take feedback from the AEA, superintendents and parents to find resolution on this topic."On the house floor Thursday, Rep. Chad Ingels, a Republican from Fayette County, explained that the Republican caucus spent upwards of 15 hours hashing out the bill, but conceded that the Democrats didn't have a say in those meetings."I admit the minority party hasn't had a lot of input on a lot of things, related to this and that's how this works here," Ingels said.Rep. Austin Baeth, a Democrat from Des Moines, says his colleagues should be more willing to work across the aisle."I feel like the majority party is not allowing input from the many experts we have in the Democratic caucus," Baeth said.The AEA Bill will now go across the rotunda to be voted on by the Senate. It would have to pass through that chamber without any changes before going to Gov. Kim Reynolds' desk.

Iowa House Democrats accused Republicans of wanting to finish up debate on the AEA bill and give it the stamp of approval before 6:30 p.m. Thursday night so they could watch the Iowa State NCAA Tournament game.

Advertisement

"I really don't want our deliberations limited by the timing of a basketball game," said Rep. Ken Croken, a Democrat from Scott County, during debate on the House floor Thursday.

The amendment was filed less than an hour before debate began, and Republicans set a 6:30 p.m. cutoff for debate. It was voted on and passed minutes later, by a margin of 51-43.

Speaker Pat Grassley denied those claims, stating the policy in the new amendment had already been debated at length.

"I haven't watched one basketball game, I don't even know who is playing and when, and if I did, I wouldn't pick the games right anyways," Grassley said.

A statement sent by a spokesperson for the House Republicans reads in part: "As the Democrats know, nothing in the amendment is new policy... We have worked hard to take feedback from the AEA, superintendents and parents to find resolution on this topic."

On the house floor Thursday, Rep. Chad Ingels, a Republican from Fayette County, explained that the Republican caucus spent upwards of 15 hours hashing out the bill, but conceded that the Democrats didn't have a say in those meetings.

"I admit the minority party hasn't had a lot of input on a lot of things, related to this and that's how this works here," Ingels said.

Rep. Austin Baeth, a Democrat from Des Moines, says his colleagues should be more willing to work across the aisle.

"I feel like the majority party is not allowing input from the many experts we have in the Democratic caucus," Baeth said.

The AEA Bill will now go across the rotunda to be voted on by the Senate. It would have to pass through that chamber without any changes before going to Gov. Kim Reynolds' desk.