vlog

Skip to content
NOWCAST vlog News at 10pm Weeknights
Watch on Demand
Advertisement

Trump signs executive order seeking to clarify college athletes' employment status

Trump signs executive order seeking to clarify college athletes' employment status
KRISTIN. ALL RIGHT, PATRICK, WE’LL SEE YOU AT THE TOP OF THE HOUR. THANK YOU. A MAJOR SETTLEMENT COULD CHANGE THE LANDSCAPE OF COLLEGE ATHLETICS. AFTER LONG OPPOSING THE MOVE, THE NCAA IS TAKING A STEP TOWARD PAYING COLLEGE ATHLETES. A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT CLAIMS THE NCAA BROKE FEDERAL LAW BY PROHIBITING COLLEGE ATHLETES FROM PROFITING FROM THE USE OF THEIR NAMES. THE NCAA, IN ITS FIVE BIGGEST CONFERENCES, INCLUDING THE BIG TEN, SETTLED THAT LAWSUIT FOR $2.8 BILLION, JOINING US THIS AFTERNOON IS MATTHEW BANKER AND ADJUNCT PROFESSOR OF LAW AT THE MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW AND A LONG TIME COLLEGE ATHLETICS ADMINISTRATOR AND SPORTS LAW ATTORNEY. THANKS FOR JOINING US HERE THIS AFTERNOON. SO FIRST, YOUR INITIAL THOUGHTS ON THIS SETTLEMENT. BREAK IT DOWN FOR US. SURE. THE NCAA HAS BEEN FACING LEGAL SCRUTINY FOR SEVERAL YEARS RIGHT NOW AS IT RELATES TO THEIR AMATEURISM RULES AND THE ABILITY TO COMPENSATE ATHLETES. SO THIS IS THIS SETTLEMENT REALLY REPRESENTS, UH, SOME PATHWAY FORWARD FOR COLLEGE SPORTS, ESPECIALLY AT THE DIVISION ONE LEVEL. AND IT’S REALLY SETTLING THREE DIFFERENT CASES THAT WERE CONSOLIDATED AS A CLASS ACTION. SO IT COMES WITH A BIG PRICE TAG OF $2.8 BILLION, BUT IT ALSO INCLUDES TERMS IN WHICH MOVING FORWARD, THERE CAN BE SOME REVENUE SHARING BETWEEN THE SCHOOLS AND THE ATHLETES THEMSELVES. AND THAT’S A MAJOR SEA CHANGE. AND YOU MENTIONED THE REVENUE SHARING. I’M GLAD YOU DID. WHAT KIND OF FRAMEWORK DOES THIS SETTLEMENT PROVIDE FOR THE SHARING OF REVENUE? YES. WHAT WHAT REALLY WAS THE FORMULA DRIVEN HERE MOVING FORWARD IS LOOKING AT DIFFERENT REVENUE STREAMS THAT THE DIVISION ONE, POWER FIVE OR AUTONOMY FIVE CONFERENCES IS LIKE THE BIG TEN, THE SEC, ACC AND SO FORTH. AND THAT’S COME OUT TO AT LEAST RIGHT NOW, ABOUT $100 MILLION IS THEIR AVERAGE ANNUAL BUDGET. AND FROM THAT, 22% OF THAT WOULD BE ALLOCATED FOR DISTRIBUTION OR REVENUE SHARING TO THE ATHLETES. AND SO THAT WILL STILL FLUCTUATE IN THE YEARS TO COME. BUT THAT’S A STARTING POINT IN WHICH INSTITUTIONS AT THE DIVISION ONE LEVEL WILL NOW HAVE TO REVISIT, SORT OF HOW THEY MANAGE THEIR BUDGETS AND ALSO A WIN FOR STUDENT ATHLETES MOVING FORWARD TO TAKE PART. AND CERTAINLY, UM, ENJOY SOME OF THE FINANCIAL SUCCESSES THAT COLLEGE SPORTS HAS SEEN IN RECENT YEARS. YOU MENTIONED THE ATHLETES MOVING FORWARD. WHAT ABOUT FORMER COLLEGE ATHLETES? YES, THAT’S ALSO PART OF THE SETTLEMENT NUMBER ITSELF. YOU MENTIONED THE $2.8 BILLION AS AS THE ACTUAL DOLLAR FIGURE TIED TO THIS. IT INCLUDES GOING BACK TO 2016, IN WHICH FORMER STUDENT ATHLETES, UM, TAKING PART IN REVENUE SHARING THAT THEY COULDN’T HAVE GOTTEN. OBVIOUSLY, THAT FIT WITHIN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS AS WELL AS NAME, IMAGE, LIKENESS, OPPORTUNITY, WHICH IS ANOTHER NEWER ASPECT IN WHICH STUDENT ATHLETES IN COLLEGE CAN MONETIZE AND EARN MONEY. THOSE STUDENT ATHLETES WHO WEREN’T ABLE TO DO THAT BECAUSE OF NCAA RULES PRIOR TO NIL COMING INTO EFFECT, WOULD ALSO BE ABLE TO TO PARTAKE IN SOME OF THE SETTLEMENT MONEY THAT’S MOVING FORWARD. AND REAL QUICKLY. I HAVE TO ASK YOU, ARE THERE WINNERS? ARE THERE LOSERS WITH THIS SETTLEMENT? IF SO, WHO FALLS ON EITHER SIDE? THAT’S A GREAT QUESTION. AND IT REMAINS AN OPEN QUESTION. EXACTLY HOW THE MONEY WILL BE DISTRIBUTED THAT WILL END UP BEING A LOCAL DECISION BY ATHLETIC DEPARTMENTS AND UNIVERSITIES. SO IN ONE WAY, IT DEFINITELY IS A WIN FOR STUDENT ATHLETES, ESPECIALLY THOSE WHO ARE GOING TO QUALIFY AND PLAY IN MORE OF THE REVENUE GENERATING SPORTS. BUT IT DOES CALL INTO QUESTION THINGS LIKE TITLE NINE AND SPORTS SPONSORSHIP, AND THE FACT THAT THERE’S A LOT OF REVENUE THAT ENDS UP SUPPORTING SPORTS ACROSS THE ENTIRE ATHLETIC DEPARTMENT IN DIVISION ONE, FOR DIVISION ONE INSTITUTIONS. SO THERE’S SOME TENSION BUILDING THERE BECAUSE OF THE FINANCIAL MODEL AND HAVING TO SHARE REVENUE. IT REMAINS AN OPEN QUESTION IN TERMS OF HOW SCHOOLS ARE GOING TO APPROACH THAT MOVING FORWARD. ALL RIGHT. SOME GREAT INFORMATION. WE HAVE TO LEAVE IT THERE. MIKE. MATTHEW, BANKER WITH MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY LAW SCHOOL, THANKS FOR YOUR TIME HERE THIS AFTERNOON. THANK YOU. NO PROBLEM. RIGHT NOW UNDER THE NATIONAL TAB ON THE 12 NEWS MOBILE APP. WHO GETS PAID HOW MUCH AND
AP logo
Updated: 4:40 PM CDT Jul 24, 2025
Editorial Standards
Advertisement
Trump signs executive order seeking to clarify college athletes' employment status
AP logo
Updated: 4:40 PM CDT Jul 24, 2025
Editorial Standards
President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order mandating that federal authorities clarify whether college athletes can be considered employees of the schools they play for — attempting to create clearer national standards for the NCAA's name image and likeness program.The move comes amid a dramatic increase in the money flowing into and around college athletics. It also follows key court victories won by current and former athletes angry that they were barred for decades, both from earning income based on their celebrity and from sharing in the billions of revenue they helped generate.Related video above: More about the NCAA deal from May to pay student athletesFacing a growing number of state laws undercutting its authority, the NCAA in July 2021 cleared the way for athletes to cash in with name, image and likeness deals with brands and sponsors. That came mere days after a 9-0 decision from the Supreme Court that found the NCAA cannot impose caps on education-related benefits schools provide to their athletes because such limits violate antitrust law.Trump's action directs the secretary of labor and the National Labor Relations Board to clarify the status of collegiate athletes through guidance or rules "that will maximize the educational benefits and opportunities provided by higher education institutions through athletics."The NCAA's embrace of NIL deals set the stage for another massive change that took effect July 1: The ability of schools to begin paying millions of dollars to their own athletes, up to $20.5 million per school over the next year. The $2.8 billion House settlement shifts even more power to college athletes, who have also won the ability to transfer from school to school without waiting to play.The NCAA has been lobbying for several years for limited antitrust protection to keep some kind of control over this new landscape — and avoid more crippling lawsuits — but a handful of bills have gone nowhere in Congress.The 1,100 universities that comprise the NCAA have insisted for decades that athletes are students who cannot be considered anything like a school employee. This stance has long been a part of the amateur model at the heart of college athletics, but that model is rapidly being replaced by a more professional structure fed by money that is coming from donors, brands and now the schools themselves. Some coaches have even suggested collective bargaining is a potential solution to the chaos they see.It is a complicated topic: Universities would become responsible for paying wages, benefits, and workers' compensation and schools and conferences have insisted they will fight any such move in court (some already have).While private institutions fall under the National Labor Relations Board, public universities must follow labor laws that vary from state to state and it's worth noting that virtually every state in the South has "right to work" laws that present challenges for unions.

President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order mandating that federal authorities clarify whether college athletes can be considered employees of the schools they play for — attempting to create clearer national standards for the NCAA's name image and likeness program.

The move comes amid a dramatic increase in the money flowing into and around college athletics. It also follows key court victories won by current and former athletes angry that they were barred for decades, both from earning income based on their celebrity and from sharing in the billions of revenue they helped generate.

Advertisement

Related video above: More about the NCAA deal from May to pay student athletes

Facing a growing number of state laws undercutting its authority, the NCAA in July 2021 cleared the way for athletes to cash in with name, image and likeness deals with brands and sponsors.

That came mere days after a 9-0 decision from the Supreme Court that found the NCAA cannot impose caps on education-related benefits schools provide to their athletes because such limits violate antitrust law.

Trump's action directs the secretary of labor and the National Labor Relations Board to clarify the status of collegiate athletes through guidance or rules "that will maximize the educational benefits and opportunities provided by higher education institutions through athletics."

The NCAA's embrace of NIL deals set the stage for another massive change that took effect July 1: The ability of schools to begin paying millions of dollars to their own athletes, up to $20.5 million per school over the next year. The $2.8 billion House settlement shifts even more power to college athletes, who have also won the ability to transfer from school to school without waiting to play.

The NCAA has been lobbying for several years for limited antitrust protection to keep some kind of control over this new landscape — and avoid more crippling lawsuits — but a handful of bills have gone nowhere in Congress.

The 1,100 universities that comprise the NCAA have insisted for decades that athletes are students who cannot be considered anything like a school employee.

This stance has long been a part of the amateur model at the heart of college athletics, but that model is rapidly being replaced by a more professional structure fed by money that is coming from donors, brands and now the schools themselves.

Some coaches have even suggested collective bargaining is a potential solution to the chaos they see.

It is a complicated topic: Universities would become responsible for paying wages, benefits, and workers' compensation and schools and conferences have insisted they will fight any such move in court (some already have).

While private institutions fall under the National Labor Relations Board, public universities must follow labor laws that vary from state to state and it's worth noting that virtually every state in the South has "right to work" laws that present challenges for unions.